ADD TO PC
BUILD

Packard IMEDIA X7600 GE

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Packard IMEDIA X7600 GE (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard FMCP7AM
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100529
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '17 at 14:19
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$115 20,482 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 36.1 2-Core 75.9 37% 57.3 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 150 20% 150 Pts	64-Core 150 9% 150 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350 22,303 User benchmarks, average bench 20% EVGA(3842 1573) 1.2GB CLim: 493 MHz, MLim: 1119 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	14% Very poor	Lighting 16.2 Reflection 24.6 Parallax 20.9 13% 20.6 fps	MRender 29.1 Gravity 13.4 Splatting 16.4 16% 19.6 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 128GB 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.4% Below average	Read 211 Write 79.2 Mixed 90 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 45.3 4K Mixed 2.77 69% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 103 DQ Write 6.73 DQ Mixed 5.61 16% 38.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 91%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 700GB free Firmware: 01.0 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 76.5 Write 74.3 Mixed 78.5 58% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 2.08 4K Mixed 0.42 110% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 51%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 564GB free Firmware: 01.0 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Read 83.7 Write 77.9 Mixed 72.7 59% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.81 4K Mixed 0.38 98% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 51%
ASMT 2105 1TB 1,332 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 502GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Read 33.9 Write 33 Mixed 7.11 29% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.98 4K Write 3.35 4K Mixed 0.37 130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 6.1 MC Mixed 4 14% 4.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 7 SC Mixed 4.7 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback