Asrock B150 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B150 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160129
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '17 at 11:58
Run Duration	349 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 81.7 1-Core 121 2-Core 215 79% 139 Pts	4-Core 388 8-Core 654 63% 521 Pts	64-Core 657 41% 657 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gainward(10B0 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Lighting 38.9 Reflection 30.5 Parallax 36.6 32% 35.3 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 35.5 30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 88GB free Firmware: DXT06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6466 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1961 (B1) Unknown 97 97 31 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 55 28 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 43 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13237780353	65.3% Good	Read 490 Write 132 Mixed 88.1 51% 237 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 82.8 4K Mixed 11.6 99% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 243 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 28.6 72% 152 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 85%
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 480 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 88 (B1) Unknown 98 98 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 63 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 21 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1624447357	66.7% Good	Read 488 Write 256 Mixed 271 74% 338 MB/s	4K Read 39.2 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 8.94 105% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 33.4 DQ Write 71.6 DQ Mixed 9.96 20% 38.3 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 110%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 158 151 7058 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6299 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 83 83 12669 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3070 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 205 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6299 (C2) HDA temperature 121 100 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	51.8% Above average	Read 97.4 Write 82.7 Mixed 76.8 64% 85.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.19 4K Mixed 0.41 112% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 931GB free Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 78 63 67394051 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 244 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 923744 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 466 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 82 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 71 471531548 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 253 (C2) HDA temperature 28 15 64424509468 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 3 1 67394051 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 64875481006237 (F1) Unknown 100 253 811712299 (F2) Unknown 100 253 785709872	102% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 163 Mixed 152 126% 169 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.33 108% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113 12,948 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 795GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 160 139 8958 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7471 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10293 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2365 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 125 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 181 181 58563 (C2) HDA temperature 121 97 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 198 198 772 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 199 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 185 0	36.4% Below average	Read 71.1 Write 55.5 Mixed 60.1 47% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.2 66% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 60%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB 1,435 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 5GB free, PID 3e00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	7.8% Terrible	Read 20.2 Write 5.71 Mixed 7.74 12% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.07 4K Write 0.71 4K Mixed 0.52 64% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.8% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBR1 2x8GB 3,127 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	67.7% Good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 19.5 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 24.8 SC Mixed 21 57% 20 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B150 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock B150 Gaming K4

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	53x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	38x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	22x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	17x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	14x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	8x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	6x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	4x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $212

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16