| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M LX V2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111130 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 10 '17 at 08:36 |
| Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD FX-8120
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
63.5%
Good
|
56% 89.5 Pts
|
35% 280 Pts
|
21% 333 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 Fury-$199
CLim: 1130 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.8%
Above average
|
53% 77.4 fps
|
62% 74.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
36% 161 MB/s
|
71% 22.5 MB/s
|
17% 28.2 MB/s
|
|
|
57.2%
Above average
|
69% 91.9 MB/s
|
86% 0.95 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
|
35.1%
Below average
|
35% 12.3 GB/s
|
19% 6.8 GB/s
|
56% 71.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M LX V2 Builds (Compare 216 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M LX V2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 43x |
| FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 29x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 14x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $144 |