Asus G11CB

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus G11CB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G11CB
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '17 at 19:50
Run Duration	407 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	78.1% Very good	Memory 86.3 1-Core 111 2-Core 213 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 644 62% 511 Pts	64-Core 651 40% 651 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85AB) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Lighting 73.3 Reflection 68.2 Parallax 64.8 60% 68.8 fps	MRender 68.5 Gravity 66.8 Splatting 68.2 56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
GOODRAM 480GB 1,234 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 261GB free Firmware: SAFM12.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 907 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 354 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 304 (AD) Unknown 100 100 327688 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 117 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 95 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2950	95.9% Outstanding	Read 518 Write 478 Mixed 487 110% 494 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 90.1 4K Mixed 14.4 114% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 296 DQ Mixed 68.5 117% 227 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 130%
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80 4,893 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 110 110 34357820 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 -106635448016195 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2605 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 544 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 34357820 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 34357820 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 34357820 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 26039 (EA) Unknown 0 0 34044 (F1) Unknown 0 0 34044 (F2) Unknown 0 0 60679	82.7% Excellent	Read 475 Write 268 Mixed 336 80% 360 MB/s	4K Read 32.5 4K Write 90 4K Mixed 20.5 123% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 14.3 78% 177 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 91%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 830GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 70 (03) Spinup time 124 124 12897026233 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 909 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2415 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 888 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1231 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1231 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 180389675045 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	99.3% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 177 Mixed 155 125% 167 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.91 4K Mixed 0.2 87% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 638GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 199 199 4445 (03) Spinup time 168 161 6591 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3950 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11870 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3794 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 689 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 156 156 132169 (C2) HDA temperature 114 104 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 84 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 21 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 199 246	46.9% Average	Read 89.1 Write 74.1 Mixed 82.8 62% 82 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.19 84% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 67%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 5,895 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 831GB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 97.6 Write 100 Mixed 81.5 119% 93 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.18 61% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,140 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 830GB free, PID a00a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 105 Write 103 Mixed 77.8 120% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.17 66% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 44%
WD A HDWD1 External 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 830GB free, PID null Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21% Poor	Read 41.4 Write 42.4 Mixed 24.9 45% 36.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.03 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.15 70% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 21%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 1,355 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 638GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 68.5 Write 77 Mixed 72.8 95% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.19 54% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 3,128 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 638GB free, PID a00c Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	30% Poor	Read 70.1 Write 72.5 Mixed 52.5 82% 65 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.28 4K Mixed 0.16 50% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 44%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 500GB 851 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 304GB free, PID 6298 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 34.6 Mixed 31.2 43% 33.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.33 4K Mixed 0.33 58% 0.72 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 67%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 750GB 156 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 205GB free, PID a207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 75.7 Write 65.3 Mixed 55.9 82% 65.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.13 52% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB 2,748 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 28.9 MC Mixed 23.2 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 21 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G11CB Builds (Compare 501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

System: Asus G11CB

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	336x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	148x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	99x
GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples	60x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	47x

SSD
HFS128G32MND-2200A 128GBBench 62%, 1,849 samples	85x
HFS256G32MND-2200A 256GBBench 70%, 3,087 samples	50x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $223Bench 175%, 7,621 samples	11x

RAM
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 16,202 samples	82x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	77x
HMA451U6AFR8N-TF 2x4GBHynixBench 68%, 8,569 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16