ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	ECT
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130423
Uptime	5.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '17 at 18:53
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 71.7 2-Core 140 60% 98.2 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 397 41% 328 Pts	64-Core 413 26% 413 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.9% Above average	Lighting 63.3 Reflection 65.7 Parallax 59.2 52% 62.7 fps	MRender 71.5 Gravity 60.7 Splatting 53.1 50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 11091 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1315 (B1) Unknown 92 92 169 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 47 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 36 (F1) Unknown 99 99 70271942420	52.7% Above average	Read 261 Write 193 Mixed 205 49% 220 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 46.8 4K Mixed 18.3 92% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 32.5 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 17.9 29% 53.8 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 285GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 99 0 (03) Spinup time 76 76 8090 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 3564 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 10295 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 22010 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 55 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3117 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 99 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 29 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 340 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 56 470679580 (C2) HDA temperature 74 53 504234010 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 8390186 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 98 253 (C8) Write error rate 100 99 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0	65% Good	Read 107 Write 120 Mixed 115 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.83 4K Write 2.42 4K Mixed 0.49 133% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 188GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 72 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896698549 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2424 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 115 115 34 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 16013 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1915 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2739 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2739 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 214749020190 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	81.7% Excellent	Read 148 Write 136 Mixed 140 107% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.75 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.19 82% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.5% Below average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 9.7 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback