Samsung R520/R522/R620

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Samsung R520/R522/R620 (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG R520/R522/R620
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091029
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '17 at 10:59
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6500 3,335 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Memory 68.8 1-Core 30 2-Core 57.6 36% 52.1 Pts	4-Core 59.3 8-Core 59.3 8% 59.3 Pts	64-Core 59.9 4% 59.9 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4300 2,791 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sanyo(144D C050) 512MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.07% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 2.15 Parallax 1.12 1% 1.54 fps	MRender 1.43 Gravity 0.53 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.07% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196 15,660 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFZ12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 728 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 476 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 7 (C2) HDA temperature 73 67 141734314011 (F1) Unknown 100 100 25331	41.7% Average	Read 255 Write 178 Mixed 163 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 24.5 4K Mixed 9.27 55% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 127 DQ Write 81.5 DQ Mixed 40.6 48% 83.1 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 95%
SAMSUNG MZ7PD256HCGM-000 256GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 238GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 33.9 Write 26.2 Mixed 29.8 38% 30 MB/s	4K Read 7.73 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 4.58 446% 6.67 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.37 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical R520/R522/R620 Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung R520/R522/R620

CPU
Core2 Duo T6400Intel $99Bench 34%, 4,995 samples	12x
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	11x
Core2 Duo P7450Intel $90Bench 36%, 2,755 samples	10x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 4650ATIBench 3%, 4,405 samples	38x
Mobility Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 2,791 samples	21x
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	3x

SSD
INTENSO 120GBBench 69%, 577 samples	3x
128GB 128GBNetacBench 58%, 1,666 samples	2x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	50x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	7x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $99

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16