Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '17 at 03:35
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 78.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 959
85% 720 Pts
64-Core 1,321
82% 1,321 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1015 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Lighting 71.5
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 87.8
58% 73.2 fps
MRender 59.7
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 77.7
55% 65.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 526
Write 418
Mixed 423
101% 455 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 62.1
4K Mixed 18.7
114% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 35.4
DQ Write 62.6
DQ Mixed 18.8
23% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
955GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 164
Write 107
Mixed 140
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.61
4K Mixed 0.17
86% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 112%
Generic External 2TB
973GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 39.4
Mixed 38.9
50% 39 MB/s
4K Read 1.01
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.35
63% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 22%
7GB free, PID 3d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
7.62% Terrible
Read 28.9
Write 6.41
Mixed 6.93
14% 14.1 MB/s
4K Read 8.51
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.01
32% 2.84 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.62%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$78
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2934 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 25.2
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 25.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $738
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback