PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock B75 Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20121210 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 06 '17 at 18:54 |
Run Duration | 1004 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
71.4%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
34%
Below average
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
80.2%
Excellent
|
|||
71.5%
Very good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
50.7%
Above average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $69Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 81x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 78x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 57x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 38x |
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 28x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 28x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $245 |