Asus M11AD

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Asus M11AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M11AD
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130815
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '17 at 20:59
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770S-$102 13,157 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 107 2-Core 184 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 531 56% 448 Pts	64-Core 552 34% 552 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000 8,041 User benchmarks, average bench 24% Nvidia(10DE 11BC) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	27% Poor	Lighting 34 Reflection 23.2 Parallax 28.2 28% 28.4 fps	MRender 27.9 Gravity 31 Splatting 34 26% 31 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Series 500GB 7,390 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 129GB free Firmware: BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (89^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 23620 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 261 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 56 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 12 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2765354273	85.1% Excellent	Read 267 Write 224 Mixed 259 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 45.9 4K Write 99.6 4K Mixed 39.8 173% 61.8 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 112 106% 164 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 85.1% Great: 89%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: ABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 129 129 21494169893 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 287 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18867 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 283 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 293 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 293 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 176094904355 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	62% Good	Read 116 Write 99.9 Mixed 91.9 77% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.44 4K Mixed 0.22 51% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 2x8GB 954 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	55.6% Above average	MC Read 20.5 MC Write 20.6 MC Mixed 16.7 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 19.5 SC Mixed 17.9 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 71.5 56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M11AD Builds (Compare 492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M11AD

CPU
Core i7-4770SIntel $102Bench 71%, 13,157 samples	119x
Core i5-4440SIntel $122Bench 67%, 3,990 samples	100x
Core i5-4460SIntelBench 66%, 10,941 samples	47x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	61x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	45x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x

RAM
ASU16D3LU1KBG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 954 samples	30x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	16x
MI64C1D1629Z1 1x8GBAdataBench 31%, 1,606 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $145

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16