Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170511
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '17 at 16:47
Run Duration	272 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	65.8% Good	Memory 64.5 1-Core 104 2-Core 203 68% 124 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 576 58% 469 Pts	64-Core 746 46% 746 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 3438) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2256 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.7% Good	Lighting 78.3 Reflection 79.6 Parallax 68.6 64% 75.5 fps	MRender 74 Gravity 72.5 Splatting 74.9 60% 73.8 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 20262 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 922 (B1) Unknown 91 91 190 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 44 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 123 (F1) Unknown 99 99 72910016402	86.3% Excellent	Read 509 Write 409 Mixed 417 99% 445 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 75.3 4K Mixed 22.9 131% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 40 DQ Write 71.4 DQ Mixed 22.3 26% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 560GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 177 6150 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6151 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 11061 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 905 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 128 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 171 171 89849 (C2) HDA temperature 117 102 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	48.5% Average	Read 85.4 Write 83.2 Mixed 70.2 60% 79.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.84 4K Mixed 0.23 80% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 134GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 175 173 4216 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8254 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 32161 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1209 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 205 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 8048 (C2) HDA temperature 109 87 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	57.7% Above average	Read 113 Write 88.5 Mixed 94.5 74% 98.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.34 88% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 76%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 206GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 319 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 71 71 8918 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6826 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 44249 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2302 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 3690 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 51 210454773793 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 156 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 6893	43.5% Average	Read 74.2 Write 77 Mixed 83.8 59% 78.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.43 103% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 75%
Kingston HyperX Fury 3.0 32GB 667 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 0GB free, PID 16a5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 38.9 Write 12.7 Mixed 20.1 26% 23.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.62 4K Write 0.52 4K Mixed 0.67 54% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4M2A2666C16 1x8GB 430 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 12.5 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 10.7 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 11.8 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $80Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $734

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)