Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160316
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 04 '17 at 04:54
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	CRI-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6100-$76 110,166 User benchmarks, average bench 55% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 100 2-Core 174 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 303 40% 299 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126 94,030 User benchmarks, average bench 40% PowerColor(148C 2373) CLim: 1270 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.5.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.3% Poor	Lighting 31.9 Reflection 45.2 Parallax 43.4 26% 40.2 fps	MRender 47.5 Gravity 29.6 Splatting 34.2 30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ZTSSD-S11-120G-P 120GB 479 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM10.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1945 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 379 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 97 97 65 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2424940 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 24 (C2) HDA temperature 67 67 141736083489 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 96 (F1) Unknown 100 100 1899	48.9% Average	Read 304 Write 300 Mixed 418 77% 341 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 26.5 4K Mixed 4.75 50% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 33.2 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 5.94 33% 70.4 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 914GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 131 131 21493842210 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1000 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5777 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 974 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1576 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1576 (C2) HDA temperature 150 150 201864839208 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 122834	81.8% Excellent	Read 180 Write 105 Mixed 157 112% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.2 88% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 465GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 68 68 4527581 (02) Throughput performance 67 67 2090 (03) Spinup time 127 127 12896698550 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 995 (05) Reallocated sector count 1 1 1921 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 118 118 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4314 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 921 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 996 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 996 (C2) HDA temperature 153 153 219044642855 (C4) Reallocation count 1 1 2124 (C5) Current pending sector count 84 84 472 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 15 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	69.2% Good	Read 103 Write 139 Mixed 116 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 0.54 4K Mixed 0.2 62% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35% Below average	MC Read 13.4 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 10.5 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 8.4 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	717x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	478x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	304x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	452x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	390x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	252x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	267x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	131x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	120x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	126x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16