Asus F2A55-M LK2

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus F2A55-M LK2 (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130902
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '17 at 17:50
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250 14,744 User benchmarks, average bench 49% FM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 122 58% 92 Pts	4-Core 207 8-Core 207 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 853F) CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.6% Average	Lighting 58.6 Reflection 66.3 Parallax 59.2 48% 61.3 fps	MRender 72.7 Gravity 58.6 Splatting 56 50% 62.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ESA3SME2HTMTT120GB 120GB 281 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: O1015A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 986 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 593 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 138 (A3) Unknown 100 100 14 (A4) Unknown 100 100 46577 (A5) Unknown 100 100 54 (A6) Unknown 100 100 8 (A7) Unknown 100 100 24 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 98 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 1 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 52 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 115544 (F2) Unknown 100 100 116677 (F5) Unknown 100 100 93154	44.6% Average	Read 200 Write 193 Mixed 192 44% 195 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 44.7 4K Mixed 16.2 76% 27.1 MB/s	DQ Read 25.9 DQ Write 73.5 DQ Mixed 18.1 23% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 92%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 418GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 143 141 3825 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1898 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17074 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1473 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 269 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1628 (C2) HDA temperature 114 93 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	41.8% Average	Read 85.9 Write 59.5 Mixed 26.1 42% 57.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.53 4K Mixed 0.31 77% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1866, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.6% Poor	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 4.8 MC Mixed 7.9 23% 8.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.6 25% 8.7 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F2A55-M LK2 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F2A55-M LK2

CPU
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	9x
A4-4000 APUAMD $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples	4x
A6-5400K APUAMD $120Bench 40%, 7,836 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	4x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	2x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	2x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
TS120GSSD220S 120GBTranscendBench 70%, 8,401 samples	2x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	15x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	4x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $288

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16