Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 02 '17 at 03:11
Run Duration	378 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 69 1-Core 107 2-Core 215 72% 130 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 833 75% 631 Pts	64-Core 1161 72% 1161 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1342 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.5.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	53% Above average	Lighting 66.3 Reflection 69.5 Parallax 81.9 54% 72.6 fps	MRender 69.4 Gravity 63.3 Splatting 56.7 51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 699GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1570 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 77 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 52 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1508312249	106% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 408 Mixed 411 98% 442 MB/s	4K Read 42.5 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 46.6 165% 55.4 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 103 111% 186 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7637 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 193 (B1) Unknown 98 98 25 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 46 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 20406902319	105% Outstanding	Read 513 Write 414 Mixed 422 100% 449 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 45.4 163% 54.8 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 97.3 102% 171 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 134%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB 10,663 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 352GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 135 4108 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6011 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 50 50 37003 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1469 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 74 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5936 (C2) HDA temperature 103 95 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 6 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 4 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 12	57.9% Above average	Read 101 Write 101 Mixed 98.8 76% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.47 4K Mixed 0.38 97% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 72%
WD WD2500YS-01SHB1 251GB 1,993 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 234GB free Firmware: 20.06C06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 54 5808 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9558 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 35 35 47941 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2755 (C2) HDA temperature 117 100 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 69711 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.5% Below average	Read 62.8 Write 60.6 Mixed 61.2 46% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.42 106% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.5% Great: 35%
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB 12,134 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 12GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	9.18% Terrible	Read 37.5 Write 12.7 Mixed 20.3 26% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.84 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.03 16% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 9.18% Great: 86%
CENTON DS Pro 4GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 0000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.89% Terrible	Read 18.6 Write 6.87 Mixed 9.23 13% 11.6 MB/s	4K Read 7.03 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 27% 2.35 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.89% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator 4x8GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (87^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.7% Very good	MC Read 27.6 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 23.8 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 28.9 SC Mixed 23.1 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 75%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,522 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	416x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	188x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $37Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)