Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	87.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	24.1 GB free of 28 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2715 x 1527 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161108
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '17 at 02:46
Run Duration	1334 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	95.2% Outstanding	Memory 90.9 1-Core 146 2-Core 291 96% 176 Pts	4-Core 574 8-Core 571 77% 573 Pts	64-Core 578 36% 578 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 372.70 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	87.9% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 120 Parallax 93.1 87% 107 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 119 Splatting 103 89% 109 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 256GB-$29 2,279 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 25GB free Firmware: X4120000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4959 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2651 (A5) Unknown 100 100 2766252216364 (A6) Unknown 100 100 23 (A7) Unknown 100 100 42 (A8) Unknown 100 100 86 (A9) Unknown 100 100 361 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 52 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1811 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 73 65 279173922843 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 12446935419730 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 13172 (EA) Unknown 100 100 19866 (F1) Unknown 253 253 15824 (F2) Unknown 253 253 25478 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	65% Good	Read 501 Write 135 Mixed 186 59% 274 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 44.1 4K Mixed 19.2 88% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 307 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 41.1 83% 172 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 36 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 39 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 67 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 22 (F1) Unknown 99 99 764590355	99% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 417 Mixed 422 100% 451 MB/s	4K Read 45.4 4K Write 94.4 4K Mixed 28.4 155% 56 MB/s	DQ Read 47.5 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 27.1 61% 119 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 99% Great: 124%
WDC WD25 00BEVS-60UST0 250GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 79GB free, PID 110c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	2.5% Terrible	Read 0.12 Write 4.9 Mixed 0.47 3% 1.83 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 0.42 4K Mixed 0.23 24% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2400C15/8G KHX2400C15D4/8G 28GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	76.9% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 29.4 MC Mixed 24.3 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 30.6 SC Mixed 24 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	3,906x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	766x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	365x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	907x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	783x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	782x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	268x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	268x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	196x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	355x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	288x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	138x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,206

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16