Asus H81M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161021
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 30 '17 at 10:14
Run Duration	524 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 101 2-Core 209 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 373 50% 375 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Nvidia(10DE 1033) 2GB CLim: 1347 MHz, MLim: 1975 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Lighting 48.4 Reflection 44 Parallax 62.1 39% 51.5 fps	MRender 61.7 Gravity 51.7 Splatting 40.8 41% 51.4 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: U21010RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 4 (09) Power-on hours count 171 100 3499 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1407 (A6) Unknown 100 100 12664 (A7) Unknown 100 100 1 (A8) Unknown 100 100 12713 (A9) Unknown 100 100 25 (AA) Unknown 100 100 4 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 12601 (AE) Unknown 100 100 323 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 10 (C2) HDA temperature 64 100 240518168612 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 435 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 423 (E8) Unknown 100 100 97 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1236897 (F1) Unknown 253 253 8565 (F2) Unknown 253 253 8616	88.9% Excellent	Read 461 Write 435 Mixed 456 101% 451 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 5.8 119% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 208 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 5.84 75% 173 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 88.9% Great: 78%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35 32,229 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 22GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 206 151 700 (04) Start/Stop count 9 9 91764 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7013 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5709 (BF) G-sense error rate 1 1 2750 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 198 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 802658 (C2) HDA temperature 117 95 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	36.7% Below average	Read 65.6 Write 62.1 Mixed 57.9 46% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.1 50% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 50%
Samsung HN-M750MBB 750GB-$58 1,121 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 15GB free Firmware: 2AR10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 86 86 4452 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7208 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4032 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 26 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2284 (B5) Unknown 98 98 54589424 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 9213 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 57 197569347618 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 14 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 26 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 85319	3.2% Terrible	Read 7.78 Write 3.31 Mixed 2.57 3% 4.55 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.17 4K Mixed 0.11 24% 0.16 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 3.2% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-010.A00LF 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 18 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 18.8 51% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 64.4 62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 2,996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	460x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	296x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	223x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	300x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	201x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	172x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	60x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	55x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16