MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Destroyer	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 67% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	89.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MSI MS-7A33
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33) (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170320
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	May 29 '17 at 22:54
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	69.4% Good	Memory 66.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 196 69% 123 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 710 66% 548 Pts	64-Core 1,224 76% 1,224 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Lighting 113 Reflection 114 Parallax 97.7 92% 108 fps	MRender 98.9 Gravity 103 Splatting 103 83% 102 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85 5,005 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM12.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 59 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 6 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 200 200 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C2) HDA temperature 69 67 141735034911	56.6% Above average	Read 492 Write 275 Mixed 278 77% 348 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 33.3 4K Mixed 6.93 63% 21.4 MB/s	DQ Read 24.5 DQ Write 81.9 DQ Mixed 6.52 18% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 93%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 536GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 67 (03) Spinup time 135 135 34387526057 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1126 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7219 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 31 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1146 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1146 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 171799937052 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	76.9% Very good	Read 139 Write 129 Mixed 127 99% 132 MB/s	4K Read 1.12 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.19 104% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 108%
Kingston SUV400S37960G 960GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 530GB free Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 50 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3 (64) Unknown 100 100 161408 (65) Unknown 100 100 40960 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 13 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 5686 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 100 150325231646 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 290 (EA) Unknown 100 100 240 (F1) Unknown 100 100 280 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0
Poor: 73% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU16GX4 2x8GB 1,403 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.1% Good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 24 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 24 SC Mixed 21.9 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	39x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	31x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	26x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	20x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	19x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	8x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	17x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $683

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PRO (MS-7A33)

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)