Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	15.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 3,228 User benchmarks, average bench 24% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Memory 38.7 1-Core 18.3 2-Core 36.3 21% 31.1 Pts	4-Core 63.1 8-Core 63.1 8% 63.1 Pts	64-Core 64.7 4% 64.7 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.23% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 1.66 1% 1.58 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 2.83 2% 2.02 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.23% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba 032G72 31GB 270 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.0 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 153 Write 43.1 Mixed 68.5 19% 88.3 MB/s	4K Read 9.31 4K Write 4.17 4K Mixed 5.62 24% 6.37 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 27%
Generic SL64G SD Card 64GB 271 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 55GB free Firmware: 8.0 Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 6.1 21% 7.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.9 GB/s	Latency 208 19% 208 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16