To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080118
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 29 '17 at 14:56
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
32.7% Below average
Memory 60.3
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 36.8
30% 40.3 Pts
4-Core 31.7
8-Core 39.4
5% 35.6 Pts
64-Core 44
3% 44 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2400-XT
Sapphire(174B E390) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
0.84% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.65
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.43
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1.87
1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.84%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 188
Write 108
Mixed 130
31% 142 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 7.73
47% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 68.4
DQ Mixed 10.6
18% 34.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 73%
WD WD8000AARS-00Y5B1 800GB
589GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 101
Write 93.3
Mixed 26
54% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.22
74% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback