Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0 (all builds)
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160718
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 28 '17 at 21:07
Run Duration	471 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 88.9 1-Core 76.8 2-Core 147 64% 104 Pts	4-Core 279 8-Core 475 46% 377 Pts	64-Core 447 28% 447 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	Lighting 39.9 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 37.6 32% 36.2 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 38 Splatting 36.3 31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79 10,862 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: X21200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 5643 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 720 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 25 (A8) Unknown 100 100 146 (A9) Unknown 100 100 359 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 46 (AE) Unknown 100 100 155 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 59 47 201864904745 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 309 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 12425 (F1) Unknown 253 253 5748 (F2) Unknown 253 253 8466 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	79.3% Very good	Read 437 Write 459 Mixed 443 100% 446 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 20.9 99% 35.3 MB/s	DQ Read 29.9 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 16.2 36% 70.7 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 537GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 170 2200 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 743 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5659 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 712 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 106 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 636 (C2) HDA temperature 105 99 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	99.8% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 171 Mixed 131 119% 160 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.37 109% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 108%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 839GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 111 Write 108 Mixed 96.6 134% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.21 77% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 63%
Corsair Voyager 16GB 622 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID 1ab1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	9.76% Terrible	Read 41.7 Write 9.12 Mixed 12.6 21% 21.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.22 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.005 27% 2.41 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.76% Great: 10%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	6.39% Terrible	Read 24.9 Write 3.72 Mixed 6.89 11% 11.8 MB/s	4K Read 8.29 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.01 31% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.39% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C8 2x4GB 3,582 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.5% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.8 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 7.4 SC Mixed 9.4 24% 8.5 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 52%

Yacht

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX R3.0

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	37x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	22x
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	9x
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples	7x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	3x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBKingstonBench 55%, 6,948 samples	4x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16