| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-S (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110307 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 28 '17 at 18:50 |
| Run Duration | 104 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
69.5%
Good
|
66% 112 Pts
|
43% 322 Pts
|
20% 324 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7990 (CrossFire Disabled)
AMD(1002 0B2A) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.5.2
|
25.3%
Poor
|
38% 46.6 fps
| ||
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
51.9%
Above average
|
48% 216 MB/s
|
92% 32.1 MB/s
|
24% 39.5 MB/s
|
|
|
83.6%
Excellent
|
95% 128 MB/s
|
170% 2.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.3%
Average
|
41% 14.2 GB/s
|
37% 13.1 GB/s
|
54% 74.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-S Builds (Compare 160 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-S
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 18x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 15x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 18x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $335 |