TYAN empty

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemTYAN empty  (all builds)
MotherboardTYAN S7025
Memory13.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '17 at 11:20
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 149
59% 100 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 474
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 1,026
64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1700 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.5.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 35.2
Parallax 69.1
42% 51.8 fps
MRender 32.3
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 43
35% 42.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 750GB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Adaptec Array 6TB
294GB free
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5273CH0-CH9 M393B5273CH0-CH9 M393B5273CH0-YH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.9% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 20.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical empty Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: TYAN empty

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $109
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback