PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | MSI MS-7693 |
Motherboard | MSI 970A-G46 (MS-7693) (all builds) |
Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20131008 |
Uptime | 3.4 Days |
Run Date | May 27 '17 at 21:10 |
Run Duration | 109 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
40.6%
Average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.62
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
39%
Below average
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 98x |
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 81x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 47x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $140Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 27x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 20x |
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $386 |