RM ONE 310

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemRM ONE 310  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67OW
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 27 '17 at 10:11
Run Duration76 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 163
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 328
43% 323 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 220
Asus(1043 8311) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 5.19
Parallax 1.38
3% 3.32 fps
MRender 6.24
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 3.91
3% 4.22 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 124
Write 110
84% 117 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ONE 310 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: RM ONE 310

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $109
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback