| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | DELL 0X501H |
| Memory | 7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090728 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | May 27 '17 at 03:08 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.7%
Good
|
62% 97.9 Pts
|
35% 281 Pts
|
22% 351 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Dell(1028 904E) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
|
1.06%
Terrible
|
1% 1.58 fps
|
1% 1.07 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Volume0 1.5TB
800GB free
Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown
|
118%
Outstanding
|
142% 189 MB/s
|
166% 1.65 MB/s
| |
|
|
39%
Below average
|
44% 58.8 MB/s
|
89% 0.78 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 6x2GB
6 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
38.9%
Below average
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
26% 9.2 GB/s
|
62% 64.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 456 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 313x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 19x |
| Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples | 16x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 38x |
| GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples | 20x |
| GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $177 |