Fujitsu ESPRIMO Mobile V6555

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO Mobile V6555 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU Z17M3.0
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091127
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 11 '15 at 09:05
Run Duration	366 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	71%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T6570 2,846 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket 479, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 16.3 2-Core 23.5 10% 19.9 Pts	4-Core 29.2 8-Core 31.6 4% 30.4 Pts	64-Core 36.3 2% 36.3 Pts
Poor: 22% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8200M G 1,369 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Fijitsu Siemens(1734 1151) 512MB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4181 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.5% Terrible	Lighting 0.43 Reflection 0.77 Parallax 0.19 0% 0.46 fps	MRender 0.62 Gravity 0.27 Splatting 1.7 1% 0.86 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.5% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59 15,217 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: PB3OC64G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 139 139 94489280514 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 16024 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 5877 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 16022 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 76 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 74573 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 210453856288 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	38.3% Below average	Read 65.8 Write 67.6 Mixed 57.7 48% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.19 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.31 64% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 42%
Kingmax USB2.0 FlashDisk 16GB 221 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 3257, TDK 16 GB Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	7.31% Terrible	Read 32.8 Write 9.02 Mixed 11.8 18% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.39 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.009 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.31% Great: 8%
TDKMedia TF090 Drive 16GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 0703, KINGMAX 16 GB Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	4.46% Terrible	Read 18.5 Write 6.63 Mixed 9.25 13% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.27 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.007 5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.46% Great: 7%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO Mobile V6555 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Mobile V6555

CPU
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	1x
Core2 Duo T6570IntelBench 34%, 2,846 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 8200M GNvidiaBench 0%, 1,369 samples	2x

SSD
SD9SB8W128G1001 128GBSandiskBench 72%, 504 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Fujitsu ESPRIMO Mobile V6555

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Mobile V6555

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)