Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20141204
Uptime	4 Days
Run Date	May 26 '17 at 21:05
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$135 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 119 2-Core 237 85% 150 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 598 65% 514 Pts	64-Core 603 37% 603 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 460-$90 64,240 User benchmarks, average bench 20% MSI(1462 809D) CLim: 1210 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.1 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Lighting 25.6 Reflection 31.4 Parallax 30.4 21% 29.2 fps	MRender 30.4 Gravity 24.2 Splatting 34.3 25% 29.7 fps
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2316RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 3188 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1196 (A6) Unknown 100 100 33 (A7) Unknown 100 100 23 (A8) Unknown 100 100 247 (A9) Unknown 100 100 188 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 122 (AE) Unknown 100 100 490 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 35 150325166114 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1030 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 15996 (F1) Unknown 253 253 3967 (F2) Unknown 253 253 7646 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	58.6% Above average	Read 403 Write 152 Mixed 215 56% 257 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 48.6 4K Mixed 18.2 78% 28.7 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 44.8 80% 159 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 91%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 189 172 3525 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 203 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 390 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 170 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 93 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1849 (C2) HDA temperature 118 106 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	75.7% Very good	Read 135 Write 129 Mixed 135 100% 133 MB/s	4K Read 0.93 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.22 103% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 84%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40 97,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 415GB free Firmware: JP4OA3GC Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 86 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 100 93 (03) Spinup time 165 100 25785925844 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2163 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 100 31 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 10018 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2126 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (B9) Unknown 100 100 65535 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 98 74 3065 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 45 421396510 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2195 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2195 (C2) HDA temperature 200 109 236223987742 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	59.7% Above average	Read 111 Write 97.3 Mixed 95.7 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.31 78% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GB 12,268 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 10.7 MC Mixed 9.1 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 12.1 SC Mixed 11 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD Builds (Compare 532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	217x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	131x
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	72x

GPU
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	59x
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	45x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
RBU-SC100S37128GD 128GBKingstonBench 58%, 1,846 samples	15x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	14x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	51x
ASU16D3LU1MNG/4G ASU16D3LFU1KBG/2G 6GBKingstonBench 41%, 371 samples	20x
M378B5173EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 4,503 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $222

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16