Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Gigabyte H87-D3H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130904
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 26 '17 at 09:39
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Memory 92.3 1-Core 114 2-Core 227 82% 145 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 585 59% 480 Pts	64-Core 582 36% 582 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 83F9) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 355.82 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	6.92% Terrible	Lighting 8.13 Reflection 7.62 Parallax 8.41 7% 8.05 fps	MRender 8.48 Gravity 7.73 Splatting 10.6 8% 8.92 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.92% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 164GB free Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5666 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 415 (B1) Unknown 98 98 37 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 41 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 17 (F1) Unknown 99 99 140150873086	86% Excellent	Read 509 Write 407 Mixed 422 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 41.6 4K Mixed 24.8 100% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 136 130% 204 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 135%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13906 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1609 (B1) Unknown 77 77 271 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 61 (F1) Unknown 99 99 49535872156	76.5% Very good	Read 479 Write 332 Mixed 337 85% 382 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 44.5 4K Mixed 18.7 95% 31.5 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 64 86% 158 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 108%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 237GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 172 8216 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3914 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 13993 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1587 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 61 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 178 178 67002 (C2) HDA temperature 120 107 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	64.4% Good	Read 94.7 Write 130 Mixed 132 90% 119 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.3 93% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 87%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 3,868 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 14GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Read 58.5 Write 60.6 Mixed 57.2 76% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.15 64% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C10D3/4G KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GB 1,037 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 17.4 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 21 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H87-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 548 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	150x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	70x
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	54x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	60x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	15x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	21x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	19x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $170

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16