Asus X99-A II

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A II (all builds)
Memory	27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160426
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 26 '17 at 01:13
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6800K-$78 50,196 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	79.9% Very good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 90.7 2-Core 223 75% 134 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 815 70% 600 Pts	64-Core 1,052 65% 1,052 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 85A0) CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2151 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.78 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.5% Poor	Lighting 33.4 Reflection 38.5 Parallax 31.2 27% 34.4 fps	MRender 47.6 Gravity 33.3 Splatting 43.5 34% 41.5 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 12TB 267 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 5.5TB free Firmware: 1.0. Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Read 159 Write 401 Mixed 169 55% 243 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 16.6 4K Mixed 1.09 13% 6.51 MB/s	DQ Read 6.51 DQ Write 14.3 DQ Mixed 3.68 5% 8.17 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 188%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 211GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9319 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1544 (B1) Unknown 98 98 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 42 36 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 192 (F1) Unknown 99 99 15207246564	84.2% Excellent	Read 496 Write 347 Mixed 275 82% 373 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 61.8 4K Mixed 22.4 119% 40.6 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 47.8 73% 139 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 126%
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 39559287 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 -96877282321447 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1170 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 183 (B1) Unknown 0 0 98 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 39 53 64427982887 (C2) HDA temperature 39 53 64427982887 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 39559287 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 39559287 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 39559287 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 14553 (EA) Unknown 0 0 14718 (F1) Unknown 0 0 14718 (F2) Unknown 0 0 13451	62.7% Good	Read 511 Write 207 Mixed 286 73% 335 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 13.8 87% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 73.1 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 30.7 42% 73.9 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 815GB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 116 99 105529728 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1275 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 2374432 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7256 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1218 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 46 739508265 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 84 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 74 74 52499 (C2) HDA temperature 41 54 60129542185 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -33801392613921 (F1) Unknown 100 253 5898886444 (F2) Unknown 100 253 10217096458	68.3% Good	Read 95.7 Write 142 Mixed 61.8 74% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.24 74% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 114%
WD Elements 1.5TB 5,064 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 511GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 36.7 Mixed 11.1 34% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.14 65% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 42.9 MC Write 54.4 MC Mixed 42.9 134% 46.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 17.4 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $78Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	694x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	193x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	188x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	213x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	180x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	108x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	67x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	63x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	40x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	29x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $881

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16