Asus X99-A II

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A II (all builds)
Memory	58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170113
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	May 25 '17 at 16:13
Run Duration	1001 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 95.5 2-Core 182 73% 123 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 667 66% 541 Pts	64-Core 846 52% 846 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.53 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.2% Very poor	Lighting 21.4 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 19.4 17% 19.1 fps	MRender 24.2 Gravity 22.6 Splatting 16 17% 21 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.2% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 124GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5758 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 955 (B1) Unknown 89 89 226 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 60 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 77 (F1) Unknown 99 99 126427239383	95.3% Outstanding	Read 501 Write 403 Mixed 418 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 37.6 123% 38.7 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 97.3 120% 215 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 623GB free Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 99 22267672 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 231 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 3792163 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 858 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 194 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 98 98 2 (BE) vendor-specific 72 53 487784476 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 16 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2592 (C2) HDA temperature 28 47 55834574876 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 55843164783218 (F1) Unknown 100 253 18481767197 (F2) Unknown 100 253 24784713802	97.4% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 159 Mixed 152 123% 164 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.34 4K Mixed 0.19 64% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 114%
Hitachi HTS541680J9SA00 80GB-$76 1,745 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 10GB free Firmware: SB2IC7UP Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 107 107 4509 (03) Spinup time 253 253 21474836480 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 2015 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 34 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 3555 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1875 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 287572004 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 106746 (C2) HDA temperature 211 211 210453856282 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 3 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	18.5% Very poor	Read 30.1 Write 34.1 Mixed 32.6 24% 32.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.28 4K Write 0.86 4K Mixed 0.18 48% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 25%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 64GB 1,861 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 51GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	7.27% Terrible	Read 21.6 Write 8.29 Mixed 11.5 15% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.81 4K Write 0.31 4K Mixed 0.6 53% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.27% Great: 10%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 64GB 1,861 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 29GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	5.35% Terrible	Read 23.3 Write 6.32 Mixed 8.27 13% 12.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.39 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.007 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.35% Great: 10%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 24GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 38.6 Write 21.5 Mixed 20.9 31% 27 MB/s	4K Read 7.48 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.83 99% 3.19 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 28%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 10GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	7.88% Terrible	Read 26.4 Write 3.56 Mixed 6.56 11% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.28 4K Write 0.81 4K Mixed 0.35 52% 1.48 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.88% Great: 8%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	7.41% Terrible	Read 26.8 Write 2.74 Mixed 5.57 10% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.35 4K Write 0.77 4K Mixed 0.47 51% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 7.41% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 8x8GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	110% Outstanding	MC Read 43.8 MC Write 44 MC Mixed 42.7 124% 43.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 17.9 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	693x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	193x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	188x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	213x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	180x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	108x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	67x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	63x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	40x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	29x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	23x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $906

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16