Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X58 (all builds)
Memory	0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 25 '17 at 15:08
Run Duration	324 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-950-$100 36,389 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 162 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 403 43% 345 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250 14,881 User benchmarks, average bench 7% PNY(196E 0593) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	8.25% Terrible	Lighting 11.3 Reflection 10.3 Parallax 3.97 9% 8.51 fps	MRender 8.9 Gravity 8.43 Splatting 6.78 6% 8.04 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.25% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160 11,787 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 86GB free Firmware: R112 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 380 Write 75.2 Mixed 111 41% 189 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 15.3 66% 24 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 95.1 DQ Mixed 35.4 48% 89 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 81%
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 46GB free Firmware: 02HD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 9752 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2735 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 128 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 210242 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 9590 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 1 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 819474216 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 96 96 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0	40.5% Average	Read 258 Write 83.2 Mixed 125 34% 155 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 7.24 70% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 78.1 DQ Mixed 45.6 53% 93.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 44%
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM0 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 366 Write 148 Mixed 204 52% 239 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 32.7 4K Mixed 14.9 63% 21.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1.96 DQ Write 45.8 DQ Mixed 22.4 18% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 76%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 305GB free Firmware: 3B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 163 163 4833 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1695 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 4799 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1599 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 81 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1695 (C2) HDA temperature 114 92 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	55.4% Above average	Read 104 Write 89.1 Mixed 95.2 72% 96 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 2.22 4K Mixed 0.39 117% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 62%
WD WD6400AAVS-00G9B1 640GB 3,696 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 295GB free Firmware: 4C05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 133 124 6316 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5648 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17444 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1449 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 187 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5648 (C2) HDA temperature 117 94 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 9 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.4% Average	Read 77.8 Write 69.4 Mixed 75.3 56% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.33 103% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 48%
Hitachi HDS72101 1TB 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 290GB free Firmware: A39C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 97 97 65542 (02) Throughput performance 133 133 104 (03) Spinup time 118 118 25790906690 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1175 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 137 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 132 132 34 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3072 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1129 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1179 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1179 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 180389412894 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 137 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 344	49.4% Average	Read 84.1 Write 88.1 Mixed 79.8 63% 84 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.18 4K Mixed 0.31 76% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 79%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 267GB free Firmware: 1118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 71 71 9550 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1088 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2466 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 4 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1019 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 78 60 370278422 (C2) HDA temperature 74 59 437387290 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 5939 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 99 417 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	47.3% Average	Read 68.7 Write 95.9 Mixed 88.6 64% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.4 102% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 62%
WD WD1500ADFD-00NLR1 150GB 1,859 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 56GB free Firmware: 7QR5 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 199 0 (03) Spinup time 163 156 4883 (04) Start/Stop count 28 28 72477 (05) Reallocated sector count 194 194 82 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24446 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 95 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4734 (C2) HDA temperature 113 85 34 (C4) Reallocation count 194 194 6 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.2% Below average	Read 53.6 Write 58.2 Mixed 51.3 41% 54.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.5 116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 6 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	35.9% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 10.7 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 10.7 28% 9.93 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	604x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	291x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	87x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	116x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	79x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	67x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $129Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	55x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	47x

RAM
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	308x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	253x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	184x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $380

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16