Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 24 '17 at 23:54
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 94.1
1-Core 131
2-Core 246
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 776
74% 612 Pts
64-Core 1,011
63% 1,011 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 116
Parallax 97.5
86% 106 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 103
82% 99.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba OCZ TL100 240GB-$56
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFZ10.1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 516
Write 19.3
Mixed 465
73% 334 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 7.37
105% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 32.3
DQ Mixed 19.4
52% 120 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 89%
Adata SP600 128GB
36GB free
Firmware: 2.9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 451
Write 121
Mixed 89.7
47% 220 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 17.2
90% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 0.59
46% 112 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 92%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 96.5
Mixed 96
73% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.24
89% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
67GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 114
Write 102
Mixed 104
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.13
4K Write 2.29
4K Mixed 0.22
114% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 109%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
143GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 41.5
Mixed 36.4
50% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.31
59% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.9% Very good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 21.8
MC Mixed 24.9
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 24.3
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $997
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback