Dell XPS 8300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 8300  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0Y2MRG
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111017
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 24 '17 at 15:12
Run Duration356 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$197
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 185
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 354
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3684) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2455 MHz, MLim: 2743 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 369.9
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.5% Poor
Lighting 28.1
Reflection 28.3
Parallax 24.4
23% 26.9 fps
MRender 36.4
Gravity 26.4
Splatting 20
22% 27.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 480GB-$70
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 357
Write 282
Mixed 304
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 14.9
62% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 21.1
DQ Write 52
DQ Mixed 15
18% 29.4 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 52%
Great: 101%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
132GB free
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 360
Write 283
Mixed 314
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 13.9
70% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 82.8
DQ Mixed 71.5
49% 58.7 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 101%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
370GB free
Firmware: 0502
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 28.6
Mixed 30.4
23% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.32
88% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18%
Great: 66%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$50
692GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 104
79% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 2.03
4K Mixed 0.34
107% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
217GB free
Firmware: JC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 116
Write 115
Mixed 103
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.35
88% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 68%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
247GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 52%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
16GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 25.2
Write 4.32
12% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-040.A00LF 9905474-040.A00LF Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.3% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8300 Builds (Compare 1,723 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Dell XPS 8300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $336
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback