EVGA 132-YW-E180-FTW

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	EVGA 132-YW-E180-FTW (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090911
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	May 24 '17 at 14:30
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650-$170 16,719 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	46.7% Average	Memory 72 1-Core 41.6 2-Core 80.8 43% 64.8 Pts	4-Core 121 8-Core 153 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 146 9% 146 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 19,550 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 82A0) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	6.02% Terrible	Lighting 8.27 Reflection 8.23 Parallax 2.88 7% 6.46 fps	MRender 4.95 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 5.52 5% 5.66 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.02% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 343GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.7% Below average	Read 130 Write 89 Mixed 98.1 23% 106 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 30.7 4K Mixed 14.2 74% 23.7 MB/s	DQ Read 25.3 DQ Write 30.5 DQ Mixed 14.2 14% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 134%
Seagate ST3400620AS 400GB-$55 3,016 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 367GB free Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 73.2 Write 76 Mixed 71.1 55% 73.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 0.91 4K Mixed 0.38 85% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 42%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 363GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 31.3 Write 86.4 Mixed 60.4 45% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.33 87% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 167GB free Firmware: KC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 130 Write 112 Mixed 102 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.02 4K Mixed 0.61 116% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DRAM Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 4.7 15% 5.33 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.1 15% 5.2 GB/s	Latency 96.8 41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 132-YW-E180-FTW Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: EVGA 132-YW-E180-FTW

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	1x
Core2 Extreme X9770IntelBench 57%, 522 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6950AMDBench 20%, 770 samples	1x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	1x
GeForce GTX 280NvidiaBench 8%, 1,404 samples	1x

SSD
Boot_Drive 500GBArecaBench 19%, 1 sample	1x
Vertex 4 256GBOCZ $400Bench 91%, 12,355 samples	1x
WDS5 00G1B0A-00H9 500GBWDCBench 55%, 4 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	2x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $170

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16