Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151215
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '17 at 14:13
Run Duration	102 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	87.2% Excellent	Memory 93.3 1-Core 118 2-Core 236 85% 149 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 468 63% 468 Pts	64-Core 469 29% 469 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 87.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362 42,960 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2843) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Lighting 35.8 Reflection 34.2 Parallax 42.5 29% 37.5 fps	MRender 40.7 Gravity 41.9 Splatting 28.9 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 29%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 7846572 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 8 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 22926535428417 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1008 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 665 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 0 0 2794 (BD) vendor-specific 29 82 38660079645 (C2) HDA temperature 29 82 38660079645 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7846572 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 8 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7846572 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7846572 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 5530 (EA) Unknown 0 0 3988 (F1) Unknown 0 0 3988 (F2) Unknown 0 0 6015	60.5% Good	Read 468 Write 170 Mixed 212 62% 283 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 54.6 4K Mixed 17.3 81% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 12.9 51% 112 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	51.2% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 15.4 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 16 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	183x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	170x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	153x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	53x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	50x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	48x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	19x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 2,134 samples	15x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $650

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16