Asus P5QC

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5QC (all builds)
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090427
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '17 at 13:47
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	BOL-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 68.2 1-Core 35.7 2-Core 71.4 39% 58.4 Pts	4-Core 142 8-Core 143 19% 143 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% EVGA(3842 3753) CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Lighting 25.1 Reflection 19.3 Parallax 22.9 20% 22.4 fps	MRender 27.5 Gravity 26.2 Splatting 19.3 19% 24.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Neutron 128GB-$90 711 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: M311 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 159 1 200 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2787 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 892 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 253 253 0 (B5) Unknown 253 253 0 (B6) Unknown 253 253 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 0 73017917470 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 96 1 200 (E7) Temperature 97 97 4 (EA) Unknown 100 100 16576 (F1) Unknown 100 100 2037 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2344 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 3632820	47% Average	Read 211 Write 216 Mixed 198 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 54.9 4K Mixed 14.4 78% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 21.1 DQ Write 80.7 DQ Mixed 14.2 22% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 83%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 73 (03) Spinup time 128 128 21494169895 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3001 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6770 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2324 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3002 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3002 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 236224249882 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	75.1% Very good	Read 132 Write 130 Mixed 85.7 86% 116 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.92 4K Mixed 0.2 93% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.6% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 6.1 18% 6.37 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.2 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 19.6% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5QC Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QC

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	37x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	12x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	10x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	6x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
Blue 250GBWD $80Bench 79%, 26,761 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	40x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	36x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16