Packard EasyNote NM98

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard EasyNote NM98 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard SJV41_CP
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100921
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 23 '17 at 12:07
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 370-$167 23,407 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Memory 58.6 1-Core 55.5 2-Core 100 44% 71.4 Pts	4-Core 143 8-Core 133 19% 138 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 037C) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.76% Terrible	Lighting 3.13 Reflection 5.12 Parallax 1.22 3% 3.16 fps	MRender 5.95 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 3.61 3% 3.95 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.76% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76 9,139 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 2930 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1689 (A5) Unknown 100 100 494026294704 (A6) Unknown 100 100 10 (A7) Unknown 100 100 11 (A8) Unknown 100 100 33 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 20 (AE) Unknown 100 100 141 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 55 53 227634708525 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 6622906680838 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2243 (EA) Unknown 100 100 7618 (F1) Unknown 253 253 5850 (F2) Unknown 253 253 7806 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	32.8% Below average	Read 230 Write 136 Mixed 141 37% 169 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 17.3 4K Mixed 8.85 40% 13.1 MB/s	DQ Read 70 DQ Write 75.1 DQ Mixed 4.68 22% 49.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 93%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB 2,523 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 26GB free, PID a838 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	8.55% Terrible	Read 28.4 Write 9.23 Mixed 22.9 24% 20.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.82 4K Write 0.57 4K Mixed 0.47 46% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.55% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 4GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1334, 1334 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.6% Poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 9.2 21% 7.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EasyNote NM98 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Packard EasyNote NM98

CPU
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	1x

RAM
M471B2873FHS-CH9 02FE EBJ21UE8BDS0-DJ-F 3GBUnknownBench 21%, 20 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Packard EasyNote NM98

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Packard EasyNote NM98

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)