Asus SABERTOOTH Z170 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 72% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH Z170 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '17 at 01:21
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Memory 96.5 1-Core 115 2-Core 239 85% 150 Pts	4-Core 539 8-Core 808 84% 674 Pts	64-Core 814 50% 814 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% MSI(1462 3232) CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	81% Excellent	Lighting 105 Reflection 116 Parallax 107 85% 109 fps	MRender 89.8 Gravity 88.2 Splatting 87.9 72% 88.6 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80 4,893 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 207GB free Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 87 87 4345136 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 -4595614996006 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3003 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 114 (B1) Unknown 0 0 5 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 4345136 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 4345136 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 4345136 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 15659 (EA) Unknown 0 0 16771 (F1) Unknown 0 0 16771 (F2) Unknown 0 0 17310	59% Above average	Read 520 Write 240 Mixed 312 79% 357 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 41.1 4K Mixed 14.2 72% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 57.4 DQ Write 37.5 DQ Mixed 36.5 30% 43.8 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 340 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 148 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 59 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 23 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2323944614	68.8% Good	Read 523 Write 416 Mixed 423 101% 454 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 11.8 74% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 23.6 DQ Write 29.7 DQ Mixed 12.4 13% 21.9 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 330GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 175 174 2216 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5595 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6077 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1651 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 229 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5369 (C2) HDA temperature 113 105 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	80.5% Excellent	Read 140 Write 140 Mixed 125 102% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.21 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.33 129% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 109%
Maxtor STM3500320AS 500GB 5,105 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 240GB free Firmware: MX1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 97 33700612 (03) Spinup time 96 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 79 79 22061 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 7 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 12979671332 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19716 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 99 299 (0C) Power cycle count 95 37 5771 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 69 69 31 (BC) Unknown 100 97 30065295400 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 57 522125343 (C2) HDA temperature 31 43 38654705695 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 30 23 33700612 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	51.7% Above average	Read 91.5 Write 88.3 Mixed 83.2 66% 87.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.51 4K Mixed 0.51 121% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 59%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90 108,153 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 149GB free Firmware: 03.03E03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1258 (03) Spinup time 135 133 4216 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10421 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 81 81 14431 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5060 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 1 1261 (BC) Unknown 100 98 65553 (BE) vendor-specific 68 49 32 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 296 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10406 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	42.7% Average	Read 73.3 Write 75.2 Mixed 71.7 55% 73.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.37 95% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56 84,291 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	MC Read 35.4 MC Write 37.4 MC Mixed 26.6 95% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 21.5 SC Write 39.8 SC Mixed 25.7 83% 29 GB/s	Latency 52.2 77% 52.2 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH Z170 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z170 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	476x
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	80x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	66x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	64x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	43x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	44x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	20x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	20x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	18x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 82% - Excellent

Total price: $532

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16