Asus P6T WS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P6T WS PRO  (all builds)
Memory0.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100924
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 21 '17 at 04:06
Run Duration371 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 940-$79
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 89.9
1-Core 65.6
2-Core 112
58% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 168
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5970 (Crossfire Disabled)
AMD(1002 2042) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.0
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 12
Parallax 20.4
18% 18.1 fps
MRender 10.7
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 15.4
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155
85GB free
Firmware: 1.3.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.5% Average
Read 194
Write 135
Mixed 117
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 11.9
72% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 72.5
DQ Mixed 40.3
46% 80.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 83%
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.K Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.6% Below average
Read 178
Write 74.2
Mixed 132
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 12.8
66% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 71.3
DQ Mixed 41.3
46% 79.6 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 42.3
Write 54.9
Mixed 24.4
30% 40.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.57
4K Mixed 0.17
43% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 60%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
159GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 79.9
Write 72.7
Mixed 50.2
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.25
80% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 87%
WD VelociRaptor 300GB-$90
27GB free
Firmware: 04.04V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 97.1
Write 94.6
Mixed 79.1
68% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.77
4K Mixed 0.59
155% 1.42 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 69%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB
17GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
4.87% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 5.85
Mixed 3.26
9% 9.09 MB/s
4K Read 4.03
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.003
15% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.87%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
35.6% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 14.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 5.3
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T WS PRO Builds (Compare 253 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T WS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $290
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback