Toshiba Satellite C870-B3W

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Toshiba Satellite C870-B3W (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 20 '17 at 21:27
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	13%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2350M 24,896 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 84 1-Core 52.8 2-Core 98.4 51% 78.4 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 133 18% 132 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7610M 308 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB41) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.932.5.3000 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	3.7% Terrible	Lighting 4.47 Reflection 5.15 Parallax 3.53 4% 4.38 fps	MRender 5 Gravity 3 Splatting 5.65 4% 4.55 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.7% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2013)-$67 4,092 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 155 152 1233 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1477 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12058 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1477 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 31 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 1 1 662906 (C2) HDA temperature 105 88 38 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	49% Average	Read 87.1 Write 83.6 Mixed 83.4 64% 84.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.61 4K Mixed 0.33 88% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 59%
StoreJet Transcend 320GB 727 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 155GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 22.6 Mixed 9.31 23% 19.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.28 55% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD32G133381S Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 6GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.4% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.8 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 10.7 SC Mixed 12 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Toshiba Satellite C870-B3W

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)