Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1842 x 1036 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '17 at 14:20
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690S-$141
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 94.3
1-Core 112
2-Core 226
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 447
59% 445 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 368.81
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 13
Parallax 19.2
17% 17.9 fps
MRender 16.8
Gravity 18
Splatting 13.9
13% 16.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 120GB-$76
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 414
Write 312
Mixed 271
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 18.5
99% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 50.6
93% 187 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76%
Great: 93%
Seagate NAS HDD 3TB-$119
2TB free
Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
79% Very good
Read 144
Write 132
Mixed 117
98% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 0.56
4K Mixed 0.2
58% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 79%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB-$136
520GB free
Firmware: SD1A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 94.6
Write 99.6
Mixed 84.8
70% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.66
4K Mixed 0.49
113% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
28GB free, PID 5590
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 149
Write 105
Mixed 120
154% 125 MB/s
4K Read 6.91
4K Write 3.45
4K Mixed 1.8
204% 4.06 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.6% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 21.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 58.9
68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $390
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback