Dell Studio XPS 8100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics36.7% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
SystemDell Studio XPS 8100
MotherboardDell Studio XPS 8100  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '17 at 05:37
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7 860-$280
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
46.2% Average
SC Int 61.9
SC Float 69.4
SC Mixed 65
52% 65.4 Pts
QC Int 214
QC Float 242
QC Mixed 226
52% 227 Pts
MC Int 322
MC Float 352
MC Mixed 345
51% 340 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660 Ti-$362
EVGA(3842 3662) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
36.7% Below average
Lighting 97.8
Reflection 88
Parallax 130
34% 105 fps
MRender 85.8
Gravity 114
Splatting 66.5
39% 88.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 42%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$150
116GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
SYSTEM NCQ 4KALIGNED SSD TRIM S.M.A.R.T
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.6% Average
Read 199
Write 225
Mixed 168
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 15.5
76% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 84.5
DQ Mixed 16.4
24% 41.7 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 90%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$110
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
NCQ 7200 RPM !4KALIGNED S.M.A.R.T
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 138
Write 113
Mixed 89.4
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.19
58% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 111%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 30.3
Write 26.2
Mixed 20.1
32% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.21
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Samsung M378B5673EH1-CF8 Samsung M378B5673EH1-CF8 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.3% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 11.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 37%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Studio XPS 8100 Builds (Compare 871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Studio XPS 8100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $370
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $308Nvidia GTX 1070 $430Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $90
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $285AMD RX 480 $265Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $114
Intel Core i5-7600K $215Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $260Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $205SanDisk Extreme 64GB $41
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $1,050SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $215SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $10
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback