| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 20.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141125 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | May 20 '17 at 03:04 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
60.2%
Good
|
60% 97.9 Pts
|
29% 220 Pts
|
14% 219 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 378.92
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.7%
Very poor
|
16% 20.6 fps
|
20% 24.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
103%
Outstanding
|
131% 174 MB/s
|
103% 0.97 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$22
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
53.9%
Above average
|
72% 95.2 MB/s
|
87% 0.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.5%
Below average
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
53% 75.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,716 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 531x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 263x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 255x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 157x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 93x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 82x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $144 |