Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 71%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160302
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '17 at 02:47
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-5930K-$590
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90% Excellent
SC Int 116
SC Float 119
SC Mixed 116
94% 117 Pts
QC Int 445
QC Float 452
QC Mixed 432
100% 443 Pts
MC Int 871
MC Float 939
MC Mixed 915
136% 908 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.2% Poor
Lighting 98
Reflection 97.7
Parallax 83.8
29% 93.2 fps
MRender 54.1
Gravity 93.6
Splatting 53.2
30% 67 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 89%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$140
24GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 401
Mixed 412
98% 440 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 46.6
162% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 130
148% 255 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 109%
Great: 115%
22GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21% Poor
Read 37.4
Write 36.9
Mixed 35.7
47% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 2.41
4K Mixed 0.26
93% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21%
Great: 21%
WDC WD75 00AYYS-01RCA0 750GB
6GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.1% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 37.5
Mixed 15.8
36% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.26
73% 0.93 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 48.6
MC Mixed 44.7
132% 46.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 22.6
58% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 61.7
65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 119%
Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 78%
Workstation 72%

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $206

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,308
The Best.
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $170Nvidia GTX 1070 $447Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $95
Intel Core i7-8700K $320Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $296Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $140
Intel Core i7-7700K $290AMD RX 480 $330Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $139
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $180SanDisk Extreme 64GB $41
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $960SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $226SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback