MSI AM1M (MS-7865)

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

System	MSI MS-7865
Motherboard	MSI AM1M (MS-7865) (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140916
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	May 20 '17 at 02:47
Run Duration	251 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 5150 APU R3 1,478 User benchmarks, average bench 32% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Memory 30.3 1-Core 20 2-Core 37 19% 29.1 Pts	4-Core 57.8 8-Core 59 8% 58.4 Pts	64-Core 68.4 4% 68.4 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3 11,968 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 7865) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.12.2 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	1.93% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 4.42 Parallax 2.81 2% 3.12 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 1.77 Splatting 3.52 2% 2.72 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.93% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX2 40GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.37 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 100 96241177 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -64922725623813 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 226 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 61 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 114 100 96241177 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 98 98 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9472 (EA) Unknown 0 0 17472 (F1) Unknown 0 0 17472 (F2) Unknown 0 0 87936	25.4% Poor	Read 104 Write 32.1 Mixed 68.5 15% 68.3 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 11.3 57% 19.6 MB/s	DQ Read 73.4 DQ Write 36.9 DQ Mixed 19.6 24% 43.3 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 41%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 85GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 143 143 25784680752 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1350 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 18772 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 129 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1505 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1505 (C2) HDA temperature 142 142 206159609898 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 28	65.7% Good	Read 123 Write 105 Mixed 105 84% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.2 84% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 36GB free Firmware: 1AG0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 87 672 (03) Spinup time 69 69 9990 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 2883 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 23587 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1229 (0D) Soft read error rate 99 87 672 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 878 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 54 723845159 (C2) HDA temperature 62 52 723714086 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 4389740 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	29.1% Poor	Read 49.9 Write 51.3 Mixed 46.3 37% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.38 90% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 58%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 13GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 120 102 6975 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3111 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 46 46 39532 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1660 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 450 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 66 66 402868 (C2) HDA temperature 107 87 40 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.6% Below average	Read 55.6 Write 57.8 Mixed 50.6 41% 54.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.19 66% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 3,868 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1.5TB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 42.6 Write 105 Mixed 59.5 98% 69.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.89 4K Mixed 0.16 72% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 1x8GB 7,988 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 6.1 16% 5.47 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 4.7 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 253 16% 253 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 35%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical AM1M (MS-7865) Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI AM1M (MS-7865)

CPU
Athlon 5350 APU R3AMDBench 34%, 3,720 samples	2x
Athlon 5150 APU R3AMDBench 32%, 1,478 samples	2x
Sempron 3850 APU R3AMDBench 30%, 515 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	2x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	1x
R7 250XAMDBench 12%, 12,863 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x

RAM
9905595-011.A00LF 2x2GBKingstonBench 40%, 113 samples	2x
16G-D3-1600-MR 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 50 samples	1x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GBCorsairBench 27%, 2,192 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 25% - Poor

Total price: $94

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16