Lenovo 20354

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20354 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Lancer 5A5
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150721
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	May 20 '17 at 00:42
Run Duration	89 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4510U 63,054 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	57.4% Above average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 77.1 2-Core 138 61% 99.2 Pts	4-Core 189 8-Core 194 26% 192 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 380D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3368 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 6.19 Parallax 5.94 3% 5.4 fps	MRender 6.57 Gravity 1.97 Splatting 5.87 4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 889 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 594 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 57 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 1 (F1) Unknown 99 99 4448139691	108% Outstanding	Read 500 Write 389 Mixed 404 96% 431 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 93.3 4K Mixed 41.7 163% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 277 DQ Mixed 117 142% 251 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 2x8GB 22,647 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	51.4% Above average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 20.3 MC Mixed 17.1 52% 18.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 16.6 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 20354 Builds (Compare 2,073 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20354

CPU
Core i7-4510UIntelBench 47%, 63,054 samples	1,033x
Core i5-4210UIntelBench 41%, 82,966 samples	858x
Core i3-4030UIntelBench 45%, 24,177 samples	81x

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	1,550x
GeForce 840MNvidiaBench 9%, 20,978 samples	394x
GeForce GT 820MNvidiaBench 4%, 958 samples	101x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	54x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	54x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	44x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	223x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	203x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	143x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16