Acer AO725

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 17%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.18%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 7 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer AO725  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ZA10_BZ
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 20 '17 at 00:35
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
8.18% Terrible
SC Int 21.3
SC Float 15.1
SC Mixed 17.6
14% 18 Pts
QC Int 40.2
QC Float 28.4
QC Mixed 32.4
8% 33.7 Pts
MC Int 40.2
MC Float 28.3
MC Mixed 32.6
5% 33.7 Pts
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.18%
Great: 9%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7290
Acer(1025 0740) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.981.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 2.6
1% 2.43 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 2.6
1% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$120
40GB free
Firmware: X2306RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 379
Write 323
Mixed 250
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 22.9
4K Mixed 13.7
52% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 69.7
DQ Write 47.1
DQ Mixed 27.7
29% 48.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 2.7
6% 2.13 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11%
Great: 19%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical AO725 Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 17%
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer AO725

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $86
The Best.
Intel Core i7-7700K $309Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
Intel Core i5-7600K $229AMD RX 480 $248Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $138
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $300Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $165
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $50Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $127SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $700SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $46Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback