Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion GJ282AA-UUW a6011.sc (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTek NARRA
Memory	1.3 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070504
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	May 19 '17 at 22:02
Run Duration	96 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6400+ 870 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	47% Average	Memory 78.4 1-Core 47.1 2-Core 94 48% 73.2 Pts	4-Core 94.3 8-Core 93.1 13% 93.7 Pts	64-Core 93.5 6% 93.5 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460 SE 3,122 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Gainward(10B0 0401) 1GB CLim: 648 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 355.98 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	10.2% Very poor	Lighting 12 Reflection 13.8 Parallax 10.5 10% 12.1 fps	MRender 12 Gravity 12.6 Splatting 15 11% 13.2 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC38 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	57.2% Above average	Read 96.7 Write 103 Mixed 91.1 73% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.37 94% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x1GB 7,767 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 3 of 4 slots used 3GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	17.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5 14% 4.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.33 GB/s	Latency 83.5 48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16