| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 76.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Dell Precision T7600 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision T7600 (all builds) |
| Memory | 14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140929 |
| Uptime | 1 Days |
| Run Date | May 19 '17 at 21:11 |
| Run Duration | 88 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
61.7%
Good
|
54% 89 Pts
|
45% 380 Pts
|
31% 504 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 353.62
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
13% 16.1 fps
|
14% 17.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
76.2%
Very good
|
107% 478 MB/s
|
82% 29.1 MB/s
|
56% 75.7 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix-00AD HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GB
4 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.8%
Below average
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
21% 7.23 GB/s
|
46% 87.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 692 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 91x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 76x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples | 75x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 39x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 36x |
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 23% - Poor | Total price: $109 |