Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2609 0 930 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63% Good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 63.5 2-Core 127 55% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 253 8-Core 505 45% 379 Pts	64-Core 506 31% 506 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Dell PERC H310 255GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.12 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 497 Write 65.7 Mixed 113 48% 225 MB/s	4K Read 24 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 19 79% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 78 DQ Mixed 54 67% 123 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 292GB free Firmware: KC45 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 115 Write 113 Mixed 118 87% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 1.12 4K Mixed 0.64 110% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B1K70DH0-CK0 2x8GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.1% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 7 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 5.5 16% 5.47 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 58%

Gunboat

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	96x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	82x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	62x

RAM
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	41x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	39x
M393B1G70BH0-YK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 67%, 378 samples	24x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $170

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16