Asrock Z170M Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics9.7% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsrock Z170M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '17 at 19:35
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-7700K-$295
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
103% Outstanding
SC Int 143
SC Float 152
SC Mixed 148
118% 148 Pts
QC Int 469
QC Float 525
QC Mixed 503
113% 499 Pts
MC Int 687
MC Float 781
MC Mixed 742
110% 737 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
ASRock(1849 5912) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64 Ver. 21.20.16.4534
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
9.7% Terrible
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 31.6
Parallax 25.6
8% 27.2 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 20.9
Splatting 38.5
11% 28.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.7%
Great: 10%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$200
198GB free
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SYSTEM 4KALIGNED
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 128% Great: 223%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3100 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
91.2% Outstanding
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 25.5
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 30.8
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 50.8
79% 50.8 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 138%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z170M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 669 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z170M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $877
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-7700K $295Nvidia GTX 1070 $410Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $97
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 $270AMD RX 480 $350Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $120
Intel Core i5-7600K $210Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $263Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $150
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $724SanDisk Extreme 64GB $33
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $77Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $155SanDisk Extreme 32GB $22
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB $56HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB $141SanDisk Extreme 16GB $20
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback